Skip to main content
FlightReady AI™
Pricing
Log inRun a readiness brief

Preflight decision intelligence

A clearer go/no-go starts before the engine does.

FlightReady brings your route, aircraft, pilot profile, current conditions, and relevant accident history into one explainable readiness assessment. You review the factors. The pilot in command makes the decision.

Run a readiness briefSee the methodology→

Advisory decision support only — not an official weather briefing and not a replacement for pilot-in-command judgment.

Demonstration assessmentNot a live briefing
KAPA────▶KASE
103 NM · DAY VFR · C182
KAPAKASETERRAIN 14,000 FT MSL
✕ historical accident (NTSB record)corridor ±10 NM

Weighted factors

  • Weather0.25
  • Pilot readiness0.15
  • Personal minimums0.15
  • Aircraft readiness0.12
  • Terrain0.10
  • Accident history0.08
Composite46 / 100
ELEVATED — REVIEW11 factors · 2 unavailable

Review drivers and mitigations before departure. The pilot in command makes the decision.

SOURCES: AWC METAR/TAF · FAA · NTSB (HISTORICAL)EXAMPLE DATA

Built around aviation weather, operational context, pilot and aircraft inputs, and historical accident records.

  • Aviation Weather Center
  • FAA aeronautical data
  • NTSB investigation records (historical)
  • Terrain and airport context
  • Pilot-entered information

Source availability varies by assessment. References do not imply endorsement. Verify all critical information with official sources.

01The problem

Preflight information is available. Judgment is still fragmented.

Every piece of the picture exists somewhere — a weather app, a NOTAM search, a logbook, a memory. What's missing is the structure that turns them into a decision you can explain.

The data is the easy part

Your EFB and briefing sources present the weather, NOTAMs, and charts well. What none of them structure is how it all combines into a decision.

Synthesis happens in your head

Marginal ceilings, a gusty crosswind, two weeks since your last flight — each fine alone. The interaction between them is weighed silently, under time pressure.

Minimums drift from conditions

Personal minimums are written down once and rarely compared, line by line, against today's actual numbers.

Paper FRATs stop at the form

Static risk-assessment forms structure the right questions — but the pilot scores every line manually, with generic weights, and the form never sees the data.

Accident history goes unread

NTSB records relevant to this exact corridor exist — in a database almost nobody queries preflight.

The rationale evaporates

The final call rests on reasoning that is hard to state, hard to teach, and gone by the time anyone wants to review it.

WEATHER APPNOTAM SEARCHAIRCRAFT KNOWLEDGEPERSONAL MINIMUMSACCIDENT HISTORYCURRENCY / RECENCYONE ASSESSMENTEvery factor, weighted,in one place.

02The system

One assessment. Every factor in context.

From flight context to a decision with a visible rationale — here is how an assessment forms, step by step.

  1. 01Step 1 of 7

    Flight context

    Departure, destination, departure time, cruise altitude, and aircraft. FlightReady resolves the route geometry and the corridor it will evaluate.

  2. 02Step 2 of 7

    Environmental conditions

    METARs, TAFs, SIGMETs, G-AIRMETs, and PIREPs are retrieved on demand from the Aviation Weather Center at analyze time — each stamped with its source and age.

  3. 03Step 3 of 7

    Pilot and aircraft context

    Your certificate, hours, currency, aircraft familiarity, and personal minimums enter the assessment as first-class factors — not an afterthought.

  4. 04Step 4 of 7

    Historical accident intelligence

    NTSB records near your corridor are retrieved by proximity, weighted by distance and recency. Historical investigative data — never described as live.

  5. 05Step 5 of 7

    Weighted factor analysis

    Eleven factors are scored deterministically and combined under published base weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight redistributes and confidence drops — visibly.

  6. 06Step 6 of 7

    Explainable briefing

    An AI-drafted narrative cites the retrieved records behind it. The language model never sets the score — it explains what the deterministic engine found.

  7. 07Step 7 of 7

    Pilot decision

    You review the factors, question them, and make the call. The assessment gives you a rationale you can state out loud — to yourself, an instructor, or a safety officer.

Assessment formingSTEP 01/07
KAPA → KASE103 NM · 14:30L · C182

Conditions · on demand

METAR 12 MINTAF 2 HRSIGMET —PIREP 41 MIN

Pilot · aircraft

PPL · 240 HR90-DAY CURRENTC182 · 38 HR TYPEMINS: 3,000/5

Corridor history

NTSB RECORDS NEAR ROUTE · DISTANCE + RECENCY WEIGHTED

Weighted factors

Weather
Terrain
Pilot readiness

Briefing · cited

“Westerly flow of this strength has historically produced mountain wave along this corridor…” [NTSB REF]

ELEVATED — REVIEW46 / 100

The pilot in command decides.

Assessment formingSTEP 07/07
KAPA → KASE103 NM · 14:30L · C182

Conditions · on demand

METAR 12 MINTAF 2 HRSIGMET —PIREP 41 MIN

Pilot · aircraft

PPL · 240 HR90-DAY CURRENTC182 · 38 HR TYPEMINS: 3,000/5

Corridor history

NTSB RECORDS NEAR ROUTE · DISTANCE + RECENCY WEIGHTED

Weighted factors

Weather
Terrain
Pilot readiness

Briefing · cited

“Westerly flow of this strength has historically produced mountain wave along this corridor…” [NTSB REF]

ELEVATED — REVIEW46 / 100

The pilot in command decides.

03Accident intelligence

Historical accidents, placed back on the route.

FlightReady surfaces route-relevant accident history so pilots and instructors can examine patterns without manually searching a national database. Each surfaced record links to its NTSB report.

Route corridor · historical eventsIllustrative — patterns from public NTSB records
DEPDEST
Select a marker to read the patterncorridor ±10 NM
En route2010s

VFR into IMC — mountain pass

A non-instrument-rated pilot continued VFR flight into deteriorating conditions near rising terrain. Lowering ceilings in a confined valley left few escape options. A common thread in corridor records: the decision point came well before the weather did.

In the product, each surfaced event links to its NTSB record. Historical similarity does not predict an outcome — it gives you patterns worth examining.

NTSB records are historical investigative information — not live data, and not a prediction. Historical similarity does not predict an outcome.

04Methodology

A score should not be a black box.

Every assessment is produced by a deterministic scoring engine with published factor weights. The AI drafts the narrative and cites its sources — it never sets the number.

Method note 01

Readiness assessment architecture

COMPOSITE VERSIONv4
FACTORS11 · weighted · renormalized
SCORE SEMANTICS0–100 advisory risk
CLASSIFICATIONSLOW · ELEVATED · HIGH · REVIEW REQUIRED
AI ROLENarrative + citations only
Read the full methodology →
Base factor weights · composite v4normalized across available factors
  • WeatherMETAR · TAF · SIGMET · G-AIRMET · PIREP0.25
  • Pilot readinessExperience, currency, recency0.15
  • Personal minimumsYour own limits vs. conditions0.15
  • Aircraft readinessType, familiarity, equipment0.12
  • TerrainElevation profile along the route0.10
  • AirportsComplexity at both ends0.08
  • Accident historyNTSB records near the corridor0.08
  • NOTAMsCoverage varies — see source labels0.05
  • Human factorsExternal pressure, fatigue inputs0.05
  • Weight & balanceWhen provided for the flight0.05
  • TrafficCorridor traffic context0.02

When a factor is unavailable for an assessment, its weight is redistributed proportionally across the factors that are available, and the assessment's confidence figure is reduced.

05Instruction

Teach the reasoning, not just the answer.

A student's go/no-go call is only half the lesson. The factor breakdown gives students and instructors the same structure to talk through.

Student

  • 01Runs the assessment before the lesson
  • 02Reviews each weighted factor and its source
  • 03Records the rationale — ready, marginal, or no-go

Instructor

  • 01Sees the same factor breakdown the student saw
  • 02Discusses the judgment, factor by factor
  • 03Builds consistent decision habits across lessons
For student pilots→For instructors→

06Flight schools

A shared preflight language across the school.

Standardize the process without taking judgment away from the pilot: structured student assessments, instructor review, and documented rationale — in early access for Part 61 and 141 programs.

Request a school demoSee the workflow→

Structured assessments

Every student works the same factor framework before every flight.

Instructor review

Assessments are reviewable — the reasoning, not just the result.

Documented rationale

Saved assessments and PDF export create a record the program can learn from.

Program visibility

Org-level views of assessment activity across the fleet (early access).

07Where it fits

Keep the tools pilots already trust.

FlightReady does not replace your EFB or official briefing. It adds a structured layer for interpreting how route, pilot, aircraft, conditions, and historical context come together.

  1. 01

    Official and operational sources

    AUTHORITATIVE

    Aviation Weather Center, Flight Service briefings, FAA aeronautical data, NOTAMs, aircraft documents.

    ↓
  2. 02

    Planning and briefing tools

    YOUR EXISTING WORKFLOW

    Your EFB — ForeFlight, Garmin Pilot — and 1800wxbrief. Where you plan, file, and obtain your official briefing.

    ↓
  3. 03

    FlightReady readiness analysis

    ADVISORY

    A structured layer for interpreting how route, pilot, aircraft, conditions, and historical context come together — with the reasoning visible.

    ↓
  4. 04

    Pilot-in-command decision

    FINAL AUTHORITY

    The go/no-go call, made by you, with a rationale you can state and revisit.

08Plans

Start free. Upgrade when the habit sticks.

No credit card to start. Cancel anytime.

Free

Start building the habit — no credit card required.

  • ·Route risk checks
  • ·5 full AI briefings per month
  • ·1 aircraft profile
  • ·7-day history
Run a readiness brief

Pro — $20/month

For pilots who fly and review regularly. $192/year (save 20%).

  • ·Unlimited AI briefings
  • ·Personal minimums enforcement
  • ·Full accident intelligence
  • ·Multiple aircraft · full history · PDF export
See full pricing

Flight school — $15/seat/month

2–100 seats, each with full Pro access. Early access program.

  • ·Structured student assessments
  • ·Instructor review workflow
  • ·Org-level visibility
Request a school demo

Full pricing details and plan comparison

09Insights

Safety analysis worth reading before you fly.

Accident-pattern analysis, methodology notes, and decision frameworks — drawn from public records and the product's own scoring model.

Accident AnalysisVMC-into-IMC: Pattern Analysis of Fatal AccidentsMar 18, 2025 · 12 min readResearchNOTAM Comprehension Failure: A Systematic ReviewFeb 24, 2025 · 9 min readAccident AnalysisContinued VFR into IMC: Decision Point AnalysisFeb 3, 2025 · 8 min readMethodologyHow FlightReady Calibrates Risk ScoresJan 15, 2025 · 14 min read
All insights→

Questions

Asked before every first brief.

FlightReady is preflight decision intelligence for pilots and flight schools. It combines your route, aircraft, pilot profile, current conditions, and relevant historical accident records into a structured, explainable readiness assessment with a 0–100 advisory score.

Get started

Make the next decision with the full picture.

A free account runs route risk checks and five full briefings a month. The first one takes about a minute.

Run a readiness briefRequest a school demo

Advisory decision support only — not an official weather briefing and not a replacement for pilot-in-command judgment.

FREE TIER · NO CREDIT CARD
FlightReady AI™

Preflight decision intelligence. FlightReady brings route, aircraft, pilot profile, current conditions, and relevant accident history into one explainable readiness assessment — so the pilot in command can decide with more context.

Data referenced from

  • NWS Aviation Weather Center
  • FAA aeronautical data
  • NTSB investigation records (historical)
  • Terrain and airport context
  • Pilot-entered information

Source availability varies by assessment. References to government data sources do not imply endorsement. Verify all critical information with official sources.

Platform

  • Platform
  • How it works
  • Methodology
  • Data sources
  • Pricing
  • Security

Solutions

  • Pilots
  • Student pilots
  • Flight schools
  • Use cases

Resources

  • FRAT guide
  • Insights
  • Blog
  • User guide
  • vs AeroCopilot

Company

  • About
  • Privacy
  • Terms

FlightReady provides advisory decision support only. It is not an official weather briefing, certified dispatch tool, or replacement for pilot-in-command judgment, flight instruction, aircraft documentation, or FAA-approved sources. Always verify critical information through official aviation sources before flight.

FlightReady AI™ is a trademark of FlightReady, LLC · © 2026 FlightReady, LLC. All rights reserved.